

1·
6 days agoThere are a lot of backend processes for those sites which need a server, so that wouldn’t work, but thank you regardless.
There are a lot of backend processes for those sites which need a server, so that wouldn’t work, but thank you regardless.
If you’re doing static sites, then traffic shouldn’t be a concern.
I host two sites that each get more than 2 million hits a month, and I run them from a $0.10 cent Scaleway server.
Cloudflare in front of the sites takes most of the load.
The thing Synology does which no competitor is yet doing is rock-solid stability.
I have a 10 year old Synology running as well as it did the day I bought it, and I’ve never needed to troubleshoot a single issue on it.
Until a competitor can match that I will still be buying Synology, with the increased drive price the cost I pay for that stability.
I think people underestimate the value of that.